Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Braz J Anesthesiol ; 70(6): 662-666, 2020.
Artigo em Português | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33279226

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Anaphylaxis is a constant perioperative concern due to the exposure to several agents capable of inducing hypersensitivity reactions. Patent blue V (PBV), also known as Sulfan Blue, a synthetic dye used in sentinel node research in breast surgery, is responsible for 0.6% of reported anaphylactic conditions. We present a case of a 49-year-old female patient who underwent left breast tumorectomy with sentinel lymph node staging using PBV and experienced an anaphylactic reaction. METHODS: We conducted a literature search through PubMed for case reports, case series, reviews, and systematic reviews since 2005 with the keywords "anaphylaxis" and "patent blue". We then included articles found in these publications' reference sections. RESULTS: We found 12 relevant publications regarding this topic. The main findings are summarized, with information regarding the clinical presentation, management, and investigation protocol. Hypotension is the most common clinical manifestation. The presentation is usually delayed when compared with anaphylaxis from other agents, and cutaneous manifestations are occasionally absent. Patients may have had previous exposure to the dye, used also as a food, clothes and drug colorant. CONCLUSION: The diagnosis of anaphylaxis in patients under sedation or general anesthesia may be difficult due to particularities of the perioperative context. According to the published literature, the presentation of the reaction is similar in most cases and a heightened clinical sense is key to address the situation appropriately. Finding the agent responsible for the allergic reaction is of paramount importance to prevent future episodes.


Assuntos
Anafilaxia/induzido quimicamente , Neoplasias da Mama/cirurgia , Corantes/efeitos adversos , Corantes de Rosanilina/efeitos adversos , Anafilaxia/complicações , Anafilaxia/diagnóstico , Feminino , Humanos , Hipotensão/etiologia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Biópsia de Linfonodo Sentinela/métodos
2.
Rev. bras. anestesiol ; 70(6): 662-666, Nov.-Dec. 2020. tab, graf
Artigo em Inglês, Português | LILACS | ID: biblio-1155769

RESUMO

Abstract Background: Anaphylaxis is a constant perioperative concern due to the exposure to several agents capable of inducing hypersensitivity reactions. Patent blue V (PBV), also known as Sulfan Blue, a synthetic dye used in sentinel node research in breast surgery, is responsible for 0.6% of reported anaphylactic conditions. We present a case of a 49-year-old female patient who underwent left breast tumorectomy with sentinel lymph node staging using PBV and experienced an anaphylactic reaction. Methods: We conducted a literature search through PubMed for case reports, case series, review and systematic reviews since 2005 with the keywords "anaphylaxis" and "patent blue". We then included articles found in these publications' reference sections. Results: We found 12 relevant publications regarding this topic. The main findings are summarized, with information regarding the clinical presentation, management, and investigation protocol. Hypotension is the most common clinical manifestation. The presentation is usually delayed when compared with anaphylaxis from other agents and cutaneous manifestations are occasionally absent. Patients may have had previous exposure to the dye, used also as a food, clothes and drug colorant. Conclusion: The diagnosis of anaphylaxis in patients under sedation or general anesthesia may be difficult due to particularities of the perioperative context. According to the published literature, the presentation of the reaction is similar in most cases and a heightened clinical sense is key to address the situation appropriately. Finding the agent responsible for the allergic reaction is of paramount importance to prevent future episodes.


Resumo Introdução: A anafilaxia pode ocorrer durante o período perioperatório devido à exposição a diversos agentes capazes de induzir reações de hipersensibilidade. O corante sintético Azul Patente V (APV), também conhecido como Sulfan Blue, é usado na pesquisa de linfonodo sentinela em cirurgia de mama, e é responsável por 0,6% dos eventos anafiláticos relatados. Descrevemos o caso de uma paciente de 49 anos de idade submetida à tumorectomia de mama esquerda com estadiamento de linfonodo sentinela, em que se empregou o APV e que apresentou reação anafilática. Método: Por meio do PubMed, pesquisamos publicações que documentavam relatos de casos, séries de casos, revisões e revisões sistemáticas desde 2005, usando as palavras-chave "anaphylaxis" e "patent blue". Em seguida, incluímos artigos encontrados na lista de referências dessas publicações. Resultados: Encontramos 12 publicações relevantes sobre o tópico. Os principais achados estão resumidos, com informações do quadro clínico, tratamento e protocolo de investigação. A hipotensão foi a manifestação clínica mais frequente. De forma geral, o quadro clínico tem início tardio quando comparado à anafilaxia por outros agentes e, ocasionalmente, as manifestações cutâneas estão ausentes. Os pacientes podem ter tido exposição prévia ao APV, que também é usado como corante de alimentos, roupas e medicamentos. Conclusão: O diagnóstico de anafilaxia em pacientes sob sedação ou anestesia geral pode ser difícil devido às peculiaridades do contexto perioperatório. Segundo a literatura publicada, a apresentação da reação é semelhante na maioria dos casos e um discernimento clínico aguçado é fundamental para enfrentar o evento adequadamente. Encontrar o agente responsável pela reação alérgica é essencial para a prevenção de futuros episódios.


Assuntos
Humanos , Feminino , Corantes de Rosanilina/efeitos adversos , Neoplasias da Mama/cirurgia , Corantes/efeitos adversos , Anafilaxia/induzido quimicamente , Biópsia de Linfonodo Sentinela/métodos , Hipotensão/etiologia , Anafilaxia/complicações , Anafilaxia/diagnóstico , Pessoa de Meia-Idade
3.
Acta Med Port ; 26(1): 12-6, 2013.
Artigo em Português | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23697352

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: The appropriate surgical positioning is an essential step that is often underestimated, but must be considered, because can lead to serious but preventable injury. The objective of this study is to evaluate the incidence of injury due to surgical positioning, as well as try to identify their risk factors. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Prospective study held for one year and included patients from different surgical specialties proposed for elective surgery. Patients were evaluated prior to surgery and exclusion criteria were: age < 18 years, American Society of Anesthesiologists - ASA score > III neuropathy or neuromuscular disease documented. Were considered injuries resulting from the positioning: erythema not reversible under digital pressure and/or persistent > 30 minutes, severe pain on pressure points and not related to the surgical site (Visual Analogue Scale - VAS = 7) and peripheral nerve injury. We evaluated the following variables: sex, age, Body Mass Index, ASA classification, anesthetic technique, type of positioning, duration of surgery and its relationship with postoperative injury. RESULTS: Of the 172 patients included in the study, perioperative lesions were identified in 12.2%, but five of these patients had more than one lesion (pain on pressure point + neuropathy). About 9.9% complained of severe pain (Visual Analogue Scale - VAS = 7) on pressure points, 4.7% presented peripheral neuropathy and 0.6% had erythema that did not yield to the digital pressure. In the group that developed lesions, no significant difference with regard to age, sex, anesthetic technique, duration of surgery and positioning was found. Concerning to ASA classification, it was found that ASA II and III patients had a higher incidence of lesion (90.5%) compared with patients ASA I (9.5%), p < 0.05. The Body Mass Index > 30 Kg / m2 showed also statistically significant association with the development of postoperative injury, p < 0.001. In separate analysis of neuropathic injury was found that Body Mass Index > 30 Kg / m2 was associated with the occurrence of neuropathy, p < 0.05. Concerning the remaining variables and their relation with postoperative neuropathy, it wasn't found a statistically significant relationship. CONCLUSION: The scientific evidence for prevention of injuries in the perioperative period, including the neuropathy is limited. The postoperative evaluation of patients is essential because it allows early recognition of lesions and its documentation and guidance.


Abstract available from the publisher.


Assuntos
Complicações Intraoperatórias/epidemiologia , Complicações Intraoperatórias/etiologia , Posicionamento do Paciente/efeitos adversos , Ferimentos e Lesões/epidemiologia , Ferimentos e Lesões/etiologia , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Feminino , Humanos , Incidência , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Prospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Adulto Jovem
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...